As you know, hospitals are all limited in their size. There are many debates whether such actions are legal, ethical or moral at all. In many countries, any murder is illegal, so not every physician or nurse is ready to do that. Killing a human is a hard choice and not every person is ready to do that even if the intentions are good.
The harsh debates around this problem make essays on euthanasia rather common assignments. Students who study in the following fields may be assigned this sort of academic writing task:. Right, the issue is rather broad. It can be viewed from many different aspects.
To make your paper stand out, you need to conduct a detailed research. This process will help to detect the cases of euthanasia, its causes, and outcomes. Secondly, suicide with the help destroys the appointment of medical institutions: If a person who does not have depression can not claim to be in a position to die. As for a person with depression, the state actually confirms that life with depression is less valuable.
Fourthly, euthanasia requires that the state and medical institutions determine whether a person should live. As a result, people with disabilities become second-class people, because their lives are less valuable than people without disabilities.
Parents of disabled children in Belgium are advised to expose children to euthanasia. Just as abortion justifies the killing of unborn children with Down syndrome and other abnormalities, euthanasia is used to kill already-born people, but less sophisticated than others. Fifthly, suicide with assistance erases borders. If someone has a mental illness and has the right to use a suicide hotline, which is funded by the government, there is a stumbling block what doctors should do.
The question is to deny a man from death or not. Then, it ups in the mind whether such pressure will be a violation of the new rights of citizens in a state where the government permits murder or not. After all, once they decided that the woman had the right to abort, people immediately began to blame those who tried to discourage women from abortion, in violation of their rights. Eightly, suicide for assistance creates a new, fictitious right, the right to death.
It undermines the right to life, which can not be abandoned, even voluntarily. The right to death is a legal absurdity. Providing the state and courts with the right to legalize murder is an extremely dangerous step that has far-reaching consequences. Next to the facts, to provide medical professionals with the legal right to kill, even in limited circumstances, are unreasonable and dangerous.
Using this right, people can hide medical negligence or ill treatment. Such precedents have already been in European countries, where euthanasia is legalized. The eleventh against proclaims that children can push their parents so that they take advantage of the new service. Such cases were recorded in the United States and Europe.
The twelfth fact explains that those who advocate the legalization of euthanasia ignore the fact that people may be under pressure and use this service for various reasons. As a thirteenth against, there is a point that there is little discussion about how the final stage of euthanasia should be carried out. So-called precautionary measures have been illusory or ineffective in all jurisdictions where euthanasia is legalized. It is known that many feel great relief if their suicide attempt was unsuccessful, but anyone can not question the victims of euthanasia or regret their decision.
Moreover, suicide for assistance is based on a secular principle. After death, nothing is possible; suicide does not affect anything. It is very arrogant. If, as Christians believe and practically all of Western civilization up until recently , life after death exists, suicide is an act with enormous moral consequences.
Also, suicide for assistance as a moral issue has never been discussed, even on the periphery. The sixteenth against proclaims that abuse of euthanasia occurs wherever it is legal. For example, judges in the Netherlands have allowed some families to subject their elderly parents with dementia to euthanasia, despite the fact that the parents themselves have never asked for euthanasia and there was no weighty evidence that they wanted to die.
Nevertheless, the elderly person reflects and decides independently. What is more, their close people and relatives are trying to resist the choice of a person to commit suicide.
It is worthy to note that older people are much better informed, more autonomous and self-confident than before and called for not underestimating the experience and qualifications of those who help to get out of life.
Also, in countries, where legalization of euthanasia exists, the prices for this service increase. In Belgium and the Netherlands every year, a huge number of people die as a result of euthanasia.
The eighteenth against implies specialists in ethics insist that forced euthanasia or rather a murder for children should be legalized. In the Netherlands, this has already happened Jotkowitz, A B. What is more, suicide for help and euthanasia devalue human life. After all, medical institutions are killing a suffering person as if a domestic animal was slaughtering.
The last but not the least is where the suicide with assistance is legalized, activists of euthanasia push this service into all possible spheres. Their words about some kind of precautionary measures and limited circumstances are an outright lie.
The ultimate goal is to provide euthanasia upon the request and without any kind of apology. It can be said that the only minus of euthanasia is its gloomy coloring in society.
It always sprawls on religious dogmas, which can not but offend the feelings of unbelievers who are hungry for it day by day. Also, people are gently saying strange and useless analogies to the past with the naturalness of death and anguish, utterances like one must live Piccirilli Dorsey, Inc.
The public was obsessed with the cult of life as an absolute good and lost any culture of death. Suicide is not savagery. This is nothing but a public opinion that still can not support euthanasia with even half of its votes. To sum up everything that was mentioned above, one should admit that the problem of euthanasia requires criminal legal regulation. As the solution to this, the fate of many hopelessly sick people, who in recent years have been in hospitals, whose physical condition is diagnosed as an intermediate one, between life and death, and the mental one, is helplessness, a state of deep despair.
Retrieved 29 August , from http: Retrieved 29 August, , from http: Retrieved 29 August Retrieved 29 August , from https: The Association, ; Document Number
The free Euthanasia research paper (Euthanasia Outline essay) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service. If you need fresh and competent research / writing on Euthanasia, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
Now, it is time to talk about the cons of euthanasia. Even if you don’t see them, still your essay must have an opposing view as well. Tell that euthanasia may devalue life and that it’s sacred. Focus on the doctor’s rights and power. Discuss religious, legal, ethical and moral issues that do not support euthanasia.
Euthanasia. Argumentative Essay: Euthanasia “The fundamental question about euthanasia: whether it is a libertarian movement for human freedom and the right of choice or, an aggressive drive to exterminate the weak, the old, and the different. This question can be answered. Voluntary Euthanasia Movement a. The Voluntary Euthanasia Movement marked the beginning of the euthanasia and assisted suicide debate. Medical journals, discussions, and public debates occurred, but made little impact. The efforts to legalize euthanasia have been present since the s%(22).
SPEECH OUTLINE (Persuasive Speech) Title: Euthanasia: To live and let die. Specific purpose: To persuade my audience that euthanasia should be legalized in Malaysia. Essay Euthanisa Outline SAMPLE PERSUASIVE OUTLINE – AVERAGE Student Y February 17, Section AY Topic: Euthanasia Goal: To persuade the audience that physician-assisted suicide, which is a subset category of euthanasia, should be a legal option.